UNIT6 Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

UNIT6 - Research Paper ExampleBussard v. Minimed, Inc. 105 Cal.App.4th 798 (2003). This is cover under the theory of respondeat superior. Id. In Bussard, the employee inhaled fumes while at work and decided to leave work. Id. On her way back from work, she got into a car accident and sued her employer for vicarious liability. Id. Here, the Court used the foreseeability analysis which examines whether the employees conduct and whether it is so surprising that it cannot be fairly attached to the employer. Id.In OShea v. Welch, the Court tack that vicarious liability is limited to injuries caused within the place setting of the employers employment. OShea v. Welch, 350 F.3d 1101 (2003). This may extend to injuries that argon reasonable incidental to that employment. Id. This would be interpreted as the employer reasonably being able to foresee these injuries as a result of the employers acts. Id. In OShea, a monetary fund manager drove from his store toward the district office of the company he worked for. During the drive, the store manager decided to turn his car into the overhaul station. Id. At that time, he got into a car accident and as a result, the plaintiff sued both the device driver and his employer for negligence and vicarious liability under the theory of respondeat superior. Id.In our case pattern, John was performing his duties as an employer by driving to the manufacturing facility for the dealership that he works for. Therefore, he was acting within the scope of his employment. However, even though his boss was with him, Johns side frolic to go to his cousins house for dinner is not foreseeable in the work that needed to be performed. It was not a detour in the road that John needed to take because of construction on the road that excrete him to the accident. John himself decided to go on a frolic to his cousins house that was not reasonably foreseeable by the employer. Under the theory of respondeat superior, an employer is responsible for h is employers actions