Cooper Industries Case Study Essay

OVERVIEWbarrel maker Industries is a broadly diversified manufacturer of electrical and general industrial products, and vim related machinery and equipment. The guild operates in three different business segments with 21 separate profit centers. These segments imply electrical and electronic, commercial and industrial, compression, drilling and energy equipment. The product line is consisted of cheap fuses to $3 million compressor tribune sets along with products such as hand tools and light fixtures.The company bid a $21-a-share tender offer to read mavin Spark Plug, manufacturer of auto spark plugs, as a counter offer for the Dana Corp.s $17.50-a-share bid. Also, in the mean m, Cooper Industries was considering a $700 million bid for Cameron Iron plant. Even though buy either or both companies will give operational and organizational advantages, there were high fiscal risks involved. Undertaking both acquisitions would result in a 55% to 60% debt to capitalization ratio.ANA LYSISCooper Industries acquired more than 60 manufacturing companies over a thirty year span in order to change magnitude the size and the scope of the company. Most of the acquired companies made it possible for Cooper to be independent of the outside environment and giving full control of the manufacturing process c at oncerning their business while avoiding anti-trust bothegations. Cooper basically purchased every company that is vital to its energy industry and all the side industries that effect it. From tools to fuses to cables to the drilling equipment was manufactured and distributed by the masss divisions.Each acquisition is decided from a wish list that was closely examined and studied. At the time of the take over, the Management Development & Planning division would implement the corporate strategy in a period of three to five years. This involves diversification and elimination of the products that are poor sellers. In some cases the end product plant is relocated and the staff is reorganized for the best efficient set up. In time all these companies are turned into profit centers.RECOMMENDATIONSOne of my first suggestions will be to consider Cameron Iron Works first since all the valves and opposite natural gas and petroleum products will be more beneficiary. simply there is more demand for Camerons products than the Champions. Little adjustments in the production process along with the Cooperization adjustment will have make the company efficient in a short period of time. In contrast, Champion is considered to have 1950s production techniques and only one product line, spark plugs, which will charter tremendous changes within the company.The other option whitethorn be to purchase both of the companies, regardless(prenominal) of the financial risks involved. By allocating all the departments such as Management Development & Planning in the process, Cooper may turn things around.Since the beginning, Coopers way of acquiring companies se em to create success stories in the end. Champion still has brand name recognition in Europe and Asia (personal knowledge) which maybe taken advantage of. major(ip) changes for the American market may take place while the revenues from the overseas sales finance the process. And once the changes are made in here, according to the demand the product line maybe readjusted for those markets.One other option for the Champion acquisition maybe to consider other possible options in the automotive part industry. There may be other companies requiring less adjustment, and maybe turned into profit centers in less time than Champion.If buying both the companies is not possible at the time, then Cameron seems like a discover option giving independence to Cooper in the valve dependence. Utilization of this company seems more of a precession at the time. However Dana may end up buying Champion if Cooper delay the acquisition.